Archive for the ‘Sharing Economy’ Category

Who Works for Uber?

Posted by | Employment, Sharing Economy | June 18, 2015

California Says that Uber Drivers are Employees, Not Contractors

Ride-sharing app Uber hit a major speed bump. The California Labor Commission ruled that its drivers are employees, not independent contractors. Uber was ordered to pay $4,000 to a driver for mileage and tolls. While that’s nothing for a company valued at $50 billion, this seemingly small distinction over what to call its drivers could mean significant changes in Uber’s business structure, and tons of money. It could also shake up the whole sharing economy just as it’s being created.

Employee vs. Independent Contractor

The difference between an employee and an independent contractor is very important for any business. The hard part is that the business does not get to choose how their workers are classified. And that classification is measured largely by the amount of control the employer has over the worker. If an employer controls the hours, wages, type of work done, and other things then the worker is likely an employee. If the worker has his own business, makes his own hours, and is paid a flat fee, it’s likely he’s an independent contractor. This distinction has a major impact on the business. The business must pay for its employees’ supplies, healthcare, withhold taxes from paychecks, and take on legal liability for the employees’ acts. An independent contractor must pay its own taxes, cover its own supplies, and is liable for their own acts.

Uber Drivers are Employees

The Commission looked at Uber’s business model and determined that Uber is “involved in every aspect of the operation.” Specifically, Uber sets rates, chooses drivers based on standards, and can fire drivers. This amount of control suggested to the Commission that the drivers were employees, not independent contractors like Uber argued. For Uber, that means it may have to pay for its drivers’ gas, car maintenance, tolls, healthcare, workers compensation, and taxes. Multiply that by more than 160,000 active drivers and you’ve got some significant costs. The driver who filed the suit only drove for a few months, and Uber had to pay her $4,000 in mileage and tolls. The Commission isn’t the only one that determines the employee/independent contractor question. The IRS is the most diligent watchdog on this matter, and courts are often involved. Florida’s unemployment agency has also ruled that Uber drivers are employees, and a court in San Francisco is considering the same question regarding tips.

Sharing Economy or Just a Company Exploiting Workers?

Ultimately, this affects not just Uber and ride apps, but the sharing economy as a whole. The entire structure is based on the independence of those doing the work from the companies that bring them together with buyers. If that relationship is undermined, then these companies are nothing more than giant corporations with a large workforce – just like everyone else. WashPo – Uber Diver is an Employee

Read More

Role Reversal for Government Regulation?

Posted by | Sharing Economy | July 07, 2014

Interesting argument here that industry disrupters, like Uber, are changing the role of government regulators. While they once made regulations to protect public safety, now they’re using those same regulations to protect old industries, like taxis. http://linkd.in/VzsXoI

Read More

What Ride Sharing Can Teach Us About Worker Classification

Posted by | Employment, Sharing Economy | May 01, 2014

Ride Sharing Sites Uber and Lyft Challenged on Issue of Independent Contractor vs. Employee

A Lyft driver, with the company’s iconic pink mustache. The mustache is required of all drivers and will be at issue in the classification dispute.

Recently, a case came to my attention that raised some very interesting issues facing online companies concerning the differentiation between independent contractors and employees. All business owners must understand the difference and be able to distinguish which is which among their workers. With the unique business models arriving online, this distinction is sometimes blurred. That’s where ride-sharing comes in.

Lyft and Uber are two companies that arrange ride-sharing in various cities (both operate in Washington, DC). They operate by allowing users to connect with various drivers around the city, and paying for a ride someplace completely through an app. These companies have raised a lot of fuss at the municipal level since they effectively operate a taxi service without adhering to any taxi regulations or licensing. But that’s not what this article is about.

Independent Contractor vs. Employee

This is about the question of independent contractor vs. employee. This difference has very practical consequences, with very steep penalties if misclassified. If your worker is an independent contractor, then you must pay them and providing a 1099 at the end of the year, but that’s about it. If they are an employee, on the other hand, then you must withhold income taxes, withhold and pay Social Security and Medicare taxes, and pay unemployment tax on wages. You may also have to provide health insurance if you qualify under the Affordable Healthcare Act. In addition, when an employee causes damage or is liable for something, then that liability typically extends to the employer.

Most business owners prefer independent contractors, for the reasons above. However, the IRS has been cracking down on misclassifications, which could force you to back-pay employment taxes and suffer fines. Your classification could also be challenged if a worker harms someone while working for you. The harmed person would probably target you as well, and the outcome could depend on the worker’s classification. Or, your workers may decide that they want the benefits of being classified as employees, and require you to treat them as such. This is what is happening to Lyft and Uber.

The Lawsuits Against Uber and Lyft

In two separate lawsuits, the drivers of Uber and Lyft are challenging their classification as independent contractors, seeking protection under the California Labor Code, which prohibits employers from taking any tips from employees. The issue arises because both Lyft and Uber did not have mandatory charges, but suggested donations. Users then “donated” to their drivers an amount, and the company then took a percentage. Since the lawsuit, Lyft has actually changed its terms and conditions to have a different set of rules for California.

The plaintiffs claim that Uber and Lyft are keeping prices artificially low by banning actual tips to the drivers. The drivers are also deprived of the typical costs that would normally be covered by an employer, and workers’ compensation and unemployment insurance. Uber and Lyft claim they are just software companies connecting people, and nothing more. They claim they are not transportation providers, and any drivers are just independent contractors, using their own cars, insurance, and on their own time.

There are a number of elements in determining the distinction between independent contractor and employee, but generally the most powerful on is the amount of control the employer has over the worker. The plaintiffs in the Lyft case point out that Lyft has a number of requirements, from fist-bumping riders to distance limits. Whether this will be enough is up to the courts, which have yet to make a decision.

The Take-Away

The case goes to show that simply stating that your workers are independent contractors is generally not enough. The courts and IRS will look at a wide range of factors to make a determination, and that will often depend on your contractor agreement and your website’s terms and conditions. That is why it is vital to have these properly drafted.

San Francisco Business Times – Lyft sued by driver who says he’s an employee, not a contractor

San Francisco Gate – Uber drivers file class-action suit over tips

Read More
Google+